Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms Pentium G3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 827 days newer than Pentium G3250.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Performs up to 16% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Pentium G3250 - 530 vs 458 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3250 - 44 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 53 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Pentium G3250
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G3250
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
576
49.02127659574468%
Multi-Core
981
10.198565339432374%
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Intel Pentium G3250 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Pentium |
| Broadwell | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 2 |
44 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 145 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
