Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 289 days older than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 145 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 44 vs 24 threads
Watch Dogs: Legion
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
99.91489361702128%
Multi-Core
6976
72.5231313026302%
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Broadwell | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 12 |
44 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
