Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 2163 days newer than Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 145 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 16% better in Sons Of The Forest than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 115 vs 99 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Ryzen 9 7950X
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Single-Core
1175
39.9931926480599%
Multi-Core
9619
49.8574612553776%
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Raphael |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 16 |
44 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 170 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
