Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 985 days older than Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Performs up to 1% better in HITMAN 3 than Ryzen 3 3200G - 197 vs 195 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 44 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 65 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Ryzen 3 3200G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 3 3200G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1052
89.53191489361703%
Multi-Core
3013
31.323422393180167%
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 4 |
44 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 145 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
