Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms Xeon E5-2695 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 3412 days newer than Xeon E5-2695 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 19% better in Deathloop than Xeon E5-2695 v2 - 198 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2 - 65 vs 115 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2 - 32 vs 24 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
198
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.75/FPS
100%
Price, €
€544.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €544.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 24 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
115 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |