Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10875H outperforms Xeon E5-2690 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10875H is 2033 days newer than Xeon E5-2690 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10875H - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10875H
- Performs up to 3% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Xeon E5-2690 v3 - 213 vs 206 FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 - 45 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Xeon E5-2690 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i7-10875H
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-10875H |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2020 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 135 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | No |
