Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms Xeon E5-2690 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 1763 days newer than Xeon E5-2690 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 7% better in Battlefield IV than Xeon E5-2690 v3 - 424 vs 398 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 - 65 vs 135 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
424
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€94.55
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €94.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 135 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
135 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |