Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2276M outperforms Xeon E5-2687W on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2276M is 2640 days newer than Xeon E5-2687W.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2687W
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2276M - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Performs up to 11% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5-2687W - 188 vs 170 FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2687W - 45 vs 150 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2687W doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon E5-2687W
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Xeon E-2276M
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2687W | vs | Intel Xeon E-2276M |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | May 29th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon E |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Server | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 150 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
