Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Xeon E5-2687W on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3956 days newer than Xeon E5-2687W.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 12% better in Monster Hunter: World than Xeon E5-2687W - 280 vs 251 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2687W - 32 vs 16 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
280
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€377.23
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €377.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10255 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2687W | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
150 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |