Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4130 outperforms Xeon E5-2687W on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4130 is 544 days newer than Xeon E5-2687W.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2687W
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Performs up to 3% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon E5-2687W - 155 vs 150 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2687W - 54 vs 150 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2687W doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
155
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€18.24
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €18.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 211 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2687W | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
150 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |