Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms Xeon E5-2687W v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 2941 days newer than Xeon E5-2687W v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 160 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 22% better in Overwatch 2 than Xeon E5-2687W v3 - 414 vs 339 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 - 24 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
414
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.97/FPS
100%
Price, €
€396.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €396.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 223 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 12 |
20 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
160 W | TDP | 170 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |