Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms Xeon E5-2687W v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 3313 days newer than Xeon E5-2687W v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 36% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-2687W v2 - 211 vs 155 FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 - 125 vs 150 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 - 24 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
211
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.03/FPS
100%
Price, €
€363.72
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €363.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |