Buy on Amazon
€128.88
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1846
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1846
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $312
Availability
MSRP in USD: $312
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4770 outperforms Xeon E5-2683 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4770 is 463 days older than Xeon E5-2683 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4770 - 28 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4770
- Performs up to 2% better in Rocket League than Xeon E5-2683 v3 - 706 vs 691 FPS
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3 - 84 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Core i7-4770
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
706
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€128.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i7-4770
Buy for €128.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 158 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Xeon E5-2683 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i7-4770
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-4770 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 4 |
28 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 120 W | TDP | 84 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Xeon E5-2683 v3 or Core i7-4770
Rocket League, 1920 x 1080, High Quality
156 FPS
€5.12/FPS
Radeon RX 580
Core i7-4770
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€799
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
