Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms Xeon E5-2680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 3166 days newer than Xeon E5-2680.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield 1 than Xeon E5-2680 - 253 vs 230 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 - 105 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2680 - 32 vs 16 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
253
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€314
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €314 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 115 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2680 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |