Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2388G outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2388G is 2557 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2388G - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2388G
- Performs up to 8% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 329 vs 304 FPS
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 95 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Xeon E5-2680 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Xeon E-2388G
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2680 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
980
42.64577893820714%
Multi-Core
6528
65.32572800960672%
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 | vs | Intel Xeon E-2388G |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2021 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon E |
| Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Server |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 120 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P750 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
