Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2680 v3 outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2680 v3 is 1303 days older than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Performs up to 6% better in New World than Celeron G4900 - 106 vs 100 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 54 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E5-2680 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
62.857142857142854%
Multi-Core
1051
16.099877450980394%
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 120 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
