Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10300 outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10300 is 2433 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10300 - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 7% better in Valheim than Xeon E5-2680 v2 - 203 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 - 65 vs 115 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
203
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.69/FPS
100%
Price, €
€139.45
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €139.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 | vs | Intel Core i3-10300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
115 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |