Buy on Amazon
€579.7
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $749
Availability
MSRP in USD: $749
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3950X is 2276 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
- Performs up to 18% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-2680 v2 - 182 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 9% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 - 105 vs 115 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 - 32 vs 20 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 9 3950X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
182
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€579.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X - Processore (16C/32T, 72 MB di cache, 4,7 GHz di boost massimo)
Buy for €579.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18282 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2680 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen 9 3950X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3950X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 10 | Cores | 16 |
| 20 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 115 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
