Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2678 v3 outperforms Core i5-3330S on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
- Performs up to 4% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-3330S - 117 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330S - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330S
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 - 65 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E5-2678 v3
Server/Workstation
Core i5-3330S
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-3330S |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 120 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
