Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100 outperforms Xeon E5-2678 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100
- Performs up to 6% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-2678 v3 - 106 vs 100 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 - 65 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2678 v3
Server/Workstation
Core i3-9100
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100 |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2018 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 120 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
