Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Xeon E5-2670 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3956 days newer than Xeon E5-2670.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 35% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-2670 - 123 vs 91 FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
123
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.72/FPS
100%
Price, €
€211
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €211 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 109 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2670 | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
115 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |