Buy on Amazon
€60.9
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1589
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1589
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2670 v3 outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2670 v3 is 358 days older than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Celeron G3900 - 197 vs 192 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 51 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
192
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.9
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron g3900 2,80 gHz LGA1151 2 MB Cache Tray
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon E5-2670 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 120 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
