Buy on Amazon
€288.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $312
Availability
MSRP in USD: $312
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4770 outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4770 is 91 days older than Xeon E5-2667 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4770 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4770
- Performs up to 11% better in Minecraft than Xeon E5-2667 v2 - 681 vs 616 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 - 84 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-4770
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
681
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€288.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel BX80646I74770 Boxed Intel Core i7-4770 Haswell Processor, 8 MB Cache, 3.40 GHz, Nero
Buy for €288.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18188 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E5-2667 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i7-4770
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-4770 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 84 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 33.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Xeon E5-2667 v2 or Core i7-4770
Minecraft, 1920 x 1080, High
365 FPS
€2.19/FPS
Radeon RX 580
Core i7-4770
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€799
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
