Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100 outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100 is 1826 days newer than Xeon E5-2667 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than Xeon E5-2667 v2 - 202 vs 200 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E5-2667 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i3-9100
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2018 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 33.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
