Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 2753 days newer than Xeon E5-2667 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 24% better in Dirt 5 than Xeon E5-2667 v2 - 183 vs 147 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 - 65 vs 130 Watts
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65579 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
640
44.01650618982118%
Multi-Core
3982
89.04293381037567%
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |