Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3930K outperforms Xeon E5-2665 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3930K is 113 days older than Xeon E5-2665.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2665
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Core i7-3930K - 115 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3930K
- Performs up to 2% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2665 - 117 vs 115 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E5-2665
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i7-3930K
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2665 | vs | Intel Core i7-3930K |
|---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 14th, 2011 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
115 W | TDP | 130 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
