Buy on Amazon
€35.36
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms Xeon E5-2665 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 1274 days newer than Xeon E5-2665.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2665
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 10% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2665 - 127 vs 115 FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2665 - 51 vs 115 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2665 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i3-6100
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
127
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.36
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-6100 3.70 GHz Dual-Core Quad-Thread 3 MB Cache 51 W CPU Processore LGA 1151
Buy for €35.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 185 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E5-2665
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i3-6100
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2665 | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 115 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
