Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3250 outperforms Xeon E5-2660 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G3250 is 323 days newer than Xeon E5-2660 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3250 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield V than Xeon E5-2660 v2 - 211 vs 209 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2 - 53 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2660 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Pentium G3250
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2660 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
433
75.17361111111111%
Multi-Core
3142
100%
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2 | vs | Intel Pentium G3250 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Pentium |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 53 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 32.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
