Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900 outperforms Xeon E5-2660 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900 is 3047 days newer than Xeon E5-2660 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 33% better in Lost Ark than Xeon E5-2660 v2 - 296 vs 222 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2 - 24 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
296
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.75/FPS
100%
Price, €
€517.32
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €517.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
20 | Threads | 24 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |