Buy on Amazon
€69
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G6405 outperforms Xeon E5-2650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium Gold G6405 is 3297 days newer than Xeon E5-2650.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6405 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6405
- Performs up to 9% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-2650 - 97 vs 89 FPS
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 - 58 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium Gold G6405
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
97
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.71/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Pentium Gold G6405 processor 4.1 GHz 4 MB Smart Cache Box
Buy for €69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58172 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2650
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Pentium Gold G6405
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2650 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6405 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Pentium Gold |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 58 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.