Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2650 v3 outperforms Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2650 v3 is 938 days newer than Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Performs up to 5% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-3820 - 162 vs 155 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 105 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 20 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
155
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 176 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-3820 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 130 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |