Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 2061 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 105 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 14% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 112 vs 98 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
112
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.49/FPS
100%
Price, €
€278.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €278.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15286 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700K |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |