Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400 outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-14400 is 3409 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-14400 - 20 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400
- Performs up to 9% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 189 vs 174 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i5-14400
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-14400 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 10 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 105 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
