Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4770 outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4770 is 91 days older than Xeon E5-2650 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4770 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4770
- Performs up to 10% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-2650 v2 - 169 vs 153 FPS
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 - 84 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
169
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.82/FPS
100%
Price, €
€138.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €138.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3460 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-4770 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 84 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |