Buy on Amazon
€77.34
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-2600S outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-2600S is 966 days older than Xeon E5-2650 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2600S - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600S
- Performs up to 1% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-2650 v2 - 154 vs 153 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-2600S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
154
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.5/FPS
100%
Price, €
€77.34
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Processore Intel Core I7-2600S I7 2600S I7 2600 S 2,8 GHz Quad-Core Eight-Core 65W CPU LGA 1155
Buy for €77.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 201 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2650 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i7-2600S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-2600S |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
