Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2650 v2 outperforms FX-8370 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2650 v2 is 366 days older than FX-8370.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8370 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8370 - 16 vs 8 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 | vs | AMD FX-8370 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |