Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100 outperforms Xeon E5-2643 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-13100 is 3412 days newer than Xeon E5-2643 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2643 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-13100 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 3% better in Control than Xeon E5-2643 v2 - 205 vs 199 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2643 v2 - 60 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2643 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
205
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.81/FPS
100%
Price, €
€165.07
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €165.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12337 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2643 v2 | vs | Intel Core i3-13100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 60 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |