Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Xeon E5-2640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 3166 days newer than Xeon E5-2640.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 95 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 34% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Xeon E5-2640 - 145 vs 108 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2640 - 24 vs 12 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
145
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.67/FPS
100%
Price, €
€242.21
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €242.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |