Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 1300X is 1053 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1300X - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Xeon E5-2640 v3 - 127 vs 126 FPS
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 - 65 vs 90 Watts
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 1300X |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
90 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |