Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms Xeon E5-2630L v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 2149 days newer than Xeon E5-2630L v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 55 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 11% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Xeon E5-2630L v3 - 259 vs 234 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
259
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€342.73
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €342.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13355 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |