Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600 outperforms Xeon E5-2630L v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6600 is 297 days newer than Xeon E5-2630L v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-6600 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600
- Performs up to 3% better in Fortnite than Xeon E5-2630L v3 - 224 vs 218 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-6600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |