Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Xeon E5-2630L v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1067 days newer than Xeon E5-2630L v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 55 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 7% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Xeon E5-2630L v3 - 72 vs 67 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 - 24 vs 16 threads
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Xeon E5-2630L v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2630L v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
868
73.93526405451448%
Multi-Core
4461
63.94782110091744%
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 12 |
| 16 | Threads | 24 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
