Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Xeon E5-2630L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2433 days newer than Xeon E5-2630L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 60 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 35% better in Rust than Xeon E5-2630L v2 - 207 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 - 20 vs 12 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
207
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€272.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €272.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11241 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |