Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms Xeon E5-2630L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 3047 days newer than Xeon E5-2630L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400F - 60 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 18% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-2630L v2 - 130 vs 110 FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
130
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€160.27
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €160.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |