Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2630L v2 outperforms Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2630L v2 is 1984 days newer than Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2
- Performs up to 1% better in Death Stranding than Phenom X4 9550 - 213 vs 211 FPS
- Consumes up to 37% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 60 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E5-2630L v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Phenom X4 9550
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 | vs | AMD Phenom X4 9550 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 27th, 2008 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Phenom X4 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Agena |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM2+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
| 2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
60 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 65 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 11.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
