Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800XT outperforms Xeon E5-2630 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800XT is 3045 days newer than Xeon E5-2630.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT - 95 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
- Performs up to 7% better in Dead Space than Xeon E5-2630 - 154 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2630 - 16 vs 12 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
154
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.75/FPS
100%
Price, €
€424.03
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €424.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15296 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |