Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2630 v3 outperforms Pentium Gold G6400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2630 v3 is 2061 days older than Pentium Gold G6400.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
- Performs up to 7% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Pentium Gold G6400 - 301 vs 282 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6400 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6400
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 58 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
282
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€71
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4350 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
85 W | TDP | 58 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |