Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700K outperforms Xeon E5-2630 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700K is 327 days newer than Xeon E5-2630 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700K - 85 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700K - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Performs up to 3% better in Death Stranding than Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 226 vs 219 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
FPS
226
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.84/FPS
100%
Price, €
€188.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 116 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700K |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 1st, 2015 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 91 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |