Buy on Amazon
€509.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $564
Availability
MSRP in USD: $564
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms Xeon E5-2620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 3857 days newer than Xeon E5-2620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 43% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-2620 - 214 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 - 32 vs 12 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel® Core™ i9-13900KF, processore desktop, per sistemi 24 core (8 P-core + 16 E-core) Cache 36 M, fino a 5,8 GHz
Buy for €509.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68758 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2620
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i9-13900KF
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2620
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Single-Core
400
13.454423141607805%
Multi-Core
1945
9.676135515645989%
Intel Xeon E5-2620 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 24 |
| 12 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.