Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900 outperforms Xeon E5-2620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900 is 3591 days newer than Xeon E5-2620.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 61% better in Rust than Xeon E5-2620 - 245 vs 152 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €364.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68705 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Single-Core
400
16.174686615446827%
Multi-Core
1945
14.911070223857712%
Intel Xeon E5-2620 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |